[RESOLVED] Urgent Advice - recordset.filter vs. new query

[RS_Arm]

Hello guys.
I'm really needing an advice.

Question:
What is faster, use recordset.filter or make a new query with my parameters?

Example:
With some calculation, this one here takes me +- 7hours to process 300000 lines

Pseudo-code from my real code, not tested

'...
for i=1 to 300000
   rs.Execute "select id, desc from table where id=" & i 
   '...some processing
next i
'...

or

'I just can't test it, no time for it

'...
rs.command "select id, desc from table"
for i = 1 to 300000
   rs.filter = " id  =  "  & i
   '... some processing
next i
'...

Oh, by the way, my db is based on MS Access2000.
For more details in database querys, please go this is my other thread, trying to resolve this with some Voodoo-SQL:
http://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?t=499176

Without this, the entire process (process 300000 rows) it only takes me +-10minutes.


Thank you once again for your help.

[RS_Arm]

Any one know something about recordset.filter?

[micdata]

actually I never test which one more faster. but I think rs.filter is faster, specially if your database is on the network. because rs.filter do the job on client and new query do the job on server and send the answer to client.

[Advertising link removed by Moderator]

[RS_Arm]

Using the filter method is really fast, compared with making a new query to the db.
It reduced from 10 hours of processing to 50minutes, only by modifying about 5 lines of code.